Impact of weight adjusted high frequency low tidal volume ventilation and atrial pacing in lesion metrics in high-power short-duration ablation: Results of a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Lesion size index (LSI) was introduced with the use of Tacticath™ and as a surrogate of lesion quality. The metric used to achieve the predetermined values involves combined information of contact force (CF), power and radiofrequency time. Rapid atrial pacing (RAP) and high-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation (HFLTV) independently or in combination improve catheter stability and CF and quality of lesions. Data of the impact of body weight adjusted HFLTV ventilation strategy associated with RAP in the lesion metrics still lacking. The study aimed to compare the results of high-power short-duration (HPSD) atrial fibrillation ablation using simultaneous weight adjusted HFLTV and RAP and standard ventilation (SV) protocol. METHODS: Prospective, nonrandomized study with 136 patients undergoing de novo ablation divided into two groups; 70 in RAP (100 ppm) + HFLTV with 4 mL/kg of tidal volume and 25 breaths/min (group A) and 66 patients with SV in intrinsic sinus rhythm (group B). Ablation using 50 W, CF of 5-10 g/10-20 g and 40 mL/minute flow rate on the posterior and anterior left atrial wall, respectively. RESULTS: No procedure-related complications. Group A: Mean LSI points 70 ± 16.5, mean total lower LSI 3.4 ± 0.5, mean total higher LSI 8.2 ± 0.4 and mean total LSI 5.6 ± 0.6. Anterior and posterior wall mean total LSI was 6.0 ± 0.4 and 4.2 ± 0.3, respectively. Mean local impedance drop (LID) points were 118.8 ± 28.4, mean LID index (%) 12.9 ± 1.5, and mean LID < 12% points 55.9 ± 23.8. Anterior and posterior wall mean total LID index were 13.6 ± 2.0 and 11.9 ± 1.7, respectively. Recurrence in 11 (15.7%) patients. Group B: Mean LSI points 56 ± 2.7, mean total lower LSI 2.9 ± 0.7, mean total higher LSI 6.9 ± 0.9, and mean total LSI 4.8 ± 0.8. Anterior and posterior wall mean total LSI was 5.1 ± 0.3 and 3.5 ± 0.5, respectively. Mean LID points were 111.4 ± 21.5, mean LID index (%) 11.4 ± 1.2, and mean LID < 12% points 54.9 ± 25.2. Anterior and posterior wall mean total LID index were 11.8 ± 1.9 and 10.3 ± 1.7, respectively. Recurrence in 14 (21.2%) patients. Mean follow up was 15.2 ± 4.4 months. CONCLUSION: Weight adjusted HFLTV ventilation with RAP HPSD ablation produced lower recurrence rate and better LSI and LID parameters in comparison to SV and intrinsic sinus rhythm.

Incidental parasympathetic cardiac denervation during atrial fibrillation ablation using high power short duration: a marker of long-term success.

BACKGROUND: There are multiple factors in both technique and substrate that lead to recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation. We sought to examine whether the degree of heart rate increase (HRI) caused by concurrent high-power-short-duration (HPSD) incidental parasympathetic denervation during AF ablation predicts long term success. Between December 2018 and December 2021, prospectively enrolled 214 patients who presented in sinus rhythm at AF ablation. Used 50 W of power and contact force (CF) of 5-15 g and 10-20 g at a flow rate of 40 mL/min on the anterior and posterior left atrial walls, respectively. RESULTS: Males were 143 (66.8%) and paroxysmal was 124 (57.9%) patients. Mean age 61.1 ± 12.3 years and follow-up time was 32.8 ± 13.2 months. Arrhythmia occurred after 90 days in 39 (18.2%) patients, 19 (48.7%) from the paroxysmal and 20 (51.3%) from the persistent AF patients. Recurrence group showed a lower HRI from a mean of 57 ± 7.7 to 64.4 ± 10.4 bpm (12.3%) while in success group HRI was from 53.8 ± 9.7 to 66.8 ± 11.6 bpm [(24.2%) p = 0.04]. We divided HRI in 3 percentiles of ≤ 8%, > 8 ≤ 37% and > 37%. A predictor of recurrence was identified in those in the first (< 8%, p = 0.006) and a predictor of success in the later (> 37%, p = 0.01) HRI percentile. CONCLUSION: Atrial fibrillation ablation with HPSD incidental cardiac parasympathetic denervation identified that patients with lower heart rate increase are prone to recurrence while those with higher heart rate increase had higher maintenance of sinus rhythm at a long-term follow-up.

Comparison between weight-adjusted, high-frequency, low-tidal-volume ventilation and atrial pacing with normal ventilation in high-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation: Results of a pilot study.

Background: Better contact force (CF) and catheter stability (CS) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are associated with higher success rate. Changes in CF and CS are observed during respiratory movements and cardiac contraction. Previous studies have suggested that rapid atrial pacing (RAP) and high-frequency, low-tidal-volume ventilation (HFLTV) independently or in combination improve CS and CF and quality of lesions. Data from a body weight-adjusted HFLTV strategy associated with RAP in AF high-power, short-duration (HPSD) ablation are still lacking. Objective: This study aimed to compare the results of HPSD AF ablation using simultaneous weight-adjusted HFLTV and RAP and standard ventilation (SV) protocol. Methods: This was a prospective, nonrandomized study with 136 patients undergoing de novo ablation were divided into 2 groups: 70 in RAP (100 ppm) + HFLTV with 4 mL/kg of tidal volume and 25 breaths/min (group A) and 66 patients with SV in intrinsic sinus rhythm (group B). The ablation used 50 W, CF of 5 to 10 g and 10 to 20 g, and 40 mL/min flow rate on the posterior and anterior left atrial walls, respectively. Results: There were no procedure-related complications. In group A, left atrial and total ablation times were 53.5 ± 8.3 minutes and 67.4 ± 10.1 minutes, respectively. Radiofrequency time was 19.7 ± 5.7 minutes, radioscopy time was 3.4 ± 1.8 minutes, 62 (88.6%) patients had first-pass isolation, 23 (33.3%) patients had elevation of luminal esophageal temperature, and 7 (10%) patients had recurrence. In group B, left atrial time was 56.7 ± 10.8 minutes, total ablation time was 72.4 ± 11.5 minutes, radiofrequency time was 22.4 ± 6.2 minutes, radioscopy time was 3.6 ± 3 minutes, 58 (87.9%) patients had first-pass isolation, and 20 (30.3%) patients had luminal esophageal temperature elevation. Conclusion: Weight-adjusted HFLTV with RAP in comparison with SV and intrinsic sinus rhythm in HPSD ablation is safe with no CO2 retention. The approach produced significantly reduced radiofrequency, left atrial, and total ablation times and better CF and local impedance drop indexes.

Comparison of outcomes with low-power long duration versus high-power short duration of ablation: the role of the acute change in sinus rhythm after the ablation as a predictor of long-term success.

Different results are described after atrial fibrillation ablation and multiple predictors of recurrence are well established. Evaluate and analyze if heart rate increase (HRI) during a first atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with low-power long-duration (LPLD) and subsequently with high-power short-duration (HPSD) can impact. Retrospectively analyzed 340 consecutive patients (pts) undergoing first AF ablation. There were 158 pts in LPLD group: 113 (71.5%) paroxysmal AF with ablation with a power of 30/20 w, on anterior and posterior left atrial (LA) wall, respectively, and contact force of 10-30g for 30 s. There were 182 pts in HPSD group: 106 (58.2%) paroxysmal AF, who underwent ablation with 45/50 w, contact force of 8-15g/10-20g and 35 mL/min flow rate on anterior and posterior left atrial wall, respectively. Median follow-up was 32 ± 16 months. Success was observed in 94 (59.5%) patients in LPLD and 152 (83.5%) in HPSD, in LPLD group we documented a median HRI of 4.3 bpm (8%), compared to preablation heart rate, while a higher HRI in HPSD group of HRI 13.5 bpm (27.2%) was noted. Heart rate increase was associated with a higher success rate in both ablation techniques and independently showed an important impact on the success rate after AF ablation. HPSD compared to LPLD showed a higher proportion of HRI and also demonstrated a superiority in maintaining sinus rhythm at a long-term follow-up.

Successful Left Atrial Appendage Closure with Watchman Device Implantation in Two Patients with Inferior Vena Cava Filters

Percutaneous procedures through femoral access in patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) filter may be at risk of complications. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) through femoral access in patients previously implanted with IVC filter. We described the WatchmanTM device implantation in two patients with formal contraindication for oral anticoagulation. First patient had a GreenfieldTM filter and the second one an OpteaseTM filter, and in this patient an attempt to withdrawal the filter immediately before the LAAC procedure failed. A femoral approach was performed in both patients using a 14 Fr sheath. Before crossing IVC filters, venographies did not detect any thrombus. All steps of IVC filter crossing were performed under fluoroscopic guidance. No immediate or intrahospital complications related to the procedure occurred. Herein, we presented two cases of successful LAAC closure with Watchman device in patients with two different kinds of IVC filters.